تبیین تلاقی هنر و معلولیت در مواجهه با افراد طیف اتیسم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری پژوهش هنر، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران. ایران.

2 استادیار گروه پژوهش و تاریخ هنر، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران، نویسنده مسئول.

3 ، دانشیار گروه پژوهش هنر، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

10.22051/jjh.2023.43481.1969

چکیده

 
در چند سال اخیر، اختلال طیف اتیسم با دامنه گسترده­ای از نابهنجاری­های رفتاری، شناختی و عصبی به­عنوان یک موضوع اجتماعی و پزشکی در فضای مطالعاتی و انتقادی معلولیت مورد توجه قرار گرفته ­است. یکی از شاخه­های اصلی این مطالعات موضوع تلاقی هنر و معلولیت است که در دو منظر متمایز قابل بررسی است: هنردرمانی و هنر ­معلولیت. این مقاله با استفاده از روش­ توصیفی- تحلیلی و گردآوری داده­ها از طریق اسناد و منابع مکتوب صورت گرفته است. با تاکید بر مفهوم تنوع عصبی -که اختلالات عصبی را نه به­عنوان اختلال که به­مثابه تنوع در فهم انسان مطرح می­کند-  به­دنبال چگونگی تبیین این دو چارچوب هنری و تفاوت­های آن­ها در مواجهه با افراد طیف اتیسم است و به این پرسش کلیدی پاسخ می­دهد که چگونه هنر معلولیت می­تواند مرزبندی­های خلق­شده توسط هنردرمانی از جمله: دیگری بودن، سلسله مراتب قدرت، تواناسالاری و ناتوان­انگاری را از میان بردارد؟ نتایج به­دست آمده نشان می­دهد: هنر معلولیت با عاملیت قرار دادن شخص معلول به عنوان هنرمند؛ قوت، هویت و توانمندی­های او را مطرح می­کند. بدین­ترتیب با از بین بردن مرزبندی­ها، این هنرمند، آثار و توانایی­هایش از سوی جامعه هنری به­منزله هنر رسمی پذیرفته شده، در گالری­ها، نمایشگاه­ها و موزه­ها و ... به­نمایش درمی­آید و حتی در مواردی با عنوان پیشگام سبک­های هنری شناخته می­شود. این نوع برداشت از هنر در مقابل هنردرمانی قرار می­گیرد که به­صورت سیستماتیک و اغلب در مراکز درمانی انجام می­شود، هنر را وسیله­ای برای بهبود و توانبخشی می­داند، شخص معلول را به­عنوان دیگری قلمداد کرده، پیوند او با درمانگر را بر­اساس روابط قدرت شکل می­دهد.
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Intersection of Art and Disability in Dealing with People on the Autism Spectrum

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zohreh Moradi 1
  • Mehdi Keshavarz Afshar 2
  • Reza Afhami 3
1 PhD Student of Art Research, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Art Studies & Art History, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, Corresponding Author.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Art Research, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiyat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

 
 
In the field of medical literature, autism was first conceptualized by Swiss psychiatrist Eugen Bleuler as a sign of childhood schizophrenia. Leo Kanner, an American-Austrian psychiatrist, described this concept as a distinct disorder in 1943. During the 1960s and 1970s, research on this new syndrome became increasingly prevalent, but there was still much confusion surrounding it. Only a few individuals, even those working in the medical field, were aware of this condition, and only a handful of cases of autism had been documented. Some researchers and physicians still interpreted it as a form of childhood schizophrenia, while others considered the characteristics of autism to be related to brain dysfunction, mental retardation, or child psychopathology.
In the 1980s, systematic research on autism increased, and researchers introduced biological factors such as deficits in theory of mind and mirror neurons as the primary causes of this abnormality. Autism was then officially classified as a distinct and diagnosable disorder within the wide spectrum of cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in the DSM-III. It was separated from childhood schizophrenia, and the term "Asperger's syndrome" became commonly used. However, it was still thought to be a very rare occurrence.
In the 1990s, more precise assessment criteria for this abnormality were formulated in the DSM-IV, and autism was described as a lifelong condition (lifetime) in individuals, classified under mental disorder number 299, and characterized by the triad of symptoms: weak social interaction, communication deficits (both verbal and non-verbal), and the presence of repetitive, stereotyped, and restricted behavioral patterns. Awareness of autism increased during the last two decades of the twentieth century. This trend grew to the point where autism became the most rapidly spreading among all developmental disabilities worldwide and turned into a global public health concern. So much so that in the DSM-5 (2013), the triad of autism symptoms was consolidated into two categories: "communication-social disorders and restricted, repetitive behaviors," Asperger's syndrome was removed from the manual, and autism was included as a wide spectrum of cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions, officially referred to as "Autism Spectrum Disorder.
This definition of autism fits within the medical mode of disability. In this model, autism is considered a global neurocognitive disorder with consistent biological foundations, characterized by core symptoms and features (lack of eye contact, repetitive movements, etc.) based on deviations from normal and normative behavior. By officially recognizing autism as a new category of "developmental disabilities," a new institutional matrix was formed, comprising social therapy, specialized education, and intervention programs. Social institutions, particularly psychiatry and psychology, played a role in shaping the hegemonic discourse that labels autism primarily as a deficiency, disorder, and illness, which will ultimately be identified and treated through continuous efforts by scientific experts. However, the approach to these individuals was not that of treating an illness but rather leaned towards "rehabilitation," emphasizing empowerment and capacity-building. Thus, various interventions were deemed necessary for two purposes: reducing autism symptoms and improving essential communication skills, social skills, and behavioral functioning. Art therapy is one of these interventions.
On the opposite pole of the medical model is the social model of disability, which is created by disabled individuals themselves and looks at the barriers created by society in terms of the full participation of disabled individuals in everyday life. According to this model, disability is not only located in the body but is created by social and material conditions that render various minds and bodies "disabled" in terms of full participation. With this model, autism can be seen as a personal, family, and social experience. It also acknowledges autistic individuals as having emotions, feelings, and social relationships that are influenced by the cultural values of the societies they live in. In this way, the individual is viewed as disabled by societal shortcomings, and instead of focusing solely on autism as an illness, it examines the individual as a human, social, and cultural phenomenon. Therefore, it not only seeks to amend and treat the person but also employs various methods, including art in addressing the definitions of autism within the medical model in expressing their identity.
In recent years, autism spectrum disorder has gained attention as a social and medical issue within the realms of scholarly and critical studies on disability. One of the primary branches of these studies focuses on the intersection of art and disability, which can be examined through two distinct perspectives: art therapy and disability arts.
This article explores the complex intersection between art, rehabilitation, and disability, as well as how art interacts with disability from the perspectives of both the medical and social models. When we talk about intersection, we are referring to a discourse that relates an individual's life, artistic practices, and power relationships. This form of intersection and relationship shapes ideas about what disability is and how it should be addressed. By juxtaposing art therapy alongside the principles of neurodiversity and disability art, the differences between them and their approaches to individuals within the autism spectrum become evident.
Based on this, the authors aim to move away from art therapy and the medical model, considering the social model to answer the following questions: How can disability art break down boundaries such as othering, power imbalances between the therapist and the client, and ableism perpetuated by art therapy? Additionally, how does art respond to the repetitive behaviors and stereotypies considered as core symptoms of individuals within the autism spectrum?
This article employs a descriptive-analytical approach to analyze the concepts presented in critical disability studies and investigate the intersection between art therapy and disability art. Information is gathered through library resources, including written and online sources, translations of books and articles, and it emphasizes the concept of neurodiversity - which presents neurological disorders not as disorders but as diversity in human understanding - in exploring how these two artistic frameworks differ in their encounters with individuals within the autism spectrum.
The results obtained from examining the conflicting relationship between the two frameworks, art therapy, and disability art, using critical disability studies in the context of individuals within the autism spectrum, demonstrate the following: On one side, there is the medical model that attributes all problems to the individual with disabilities and, based on the concept of empowerment, directs the disabled individual towards an ideal and normative world for acceptance by society. In this model, art therapy is used as an intervention and tool for improving and ultimately curing individual and behavioral deficiencies. Healthcare professionals, particularly psychologists, play a central role in this field. They view their primary task and objective as empowerment, improvement, and the elimination of autism symptoms such as social interaction deficits and repetitive behaviors. However, since the relationships established between the individual and the expert are based on the doctor-patient model and aimed at treatment, in most cases, the individual is considered as the other, and power relations between them are formative.
On the other hand, disability arts aim to dismantle all the boundaries created by art therapy using the social model. It presents an autistic individual as a distinct identity. Unlike art therapy, it illustrates how autistic identities offer valuable insights into reimagining and expanding ideas related to "normalcy" or cognitive abilities. In contrast to medicalizing disability-related art and art therapy programs, which often solely provide art education and do not consider professional training for participants, disability arts transform the signs and characteristics of an autistic individual (considered deficits in the medical model) into strengths. In other words, art therapy is a systematic and therapeutic approach to art that is often conducted in clinical settings, with a focus on improvement and rehabilitation. In contrast, disability arts represent a recognized and accepted form of art within the artistic community, displayed in galleries, exhibitions, museums, etc. The artist's work and abilities are acknowledged with the label of disability. In essence, while art therapy seeks rehabilitation or "normalization," disability arts, which belong to disability studies, challenge this perspective by using a new paradigm called "neurodiversity." This paradigm does not see conditions like autism as disorders to be fixed but as alternative ways of living. In this context, the autism spectrum represents a range of cognitive styles and ways of experiencing the world. Disability arts, originating from lived experiences, challenge societal norms and resist dominant narratives, attempting to shift the conversation from "curing" or "overcoming" disability toward acceptance, empowerment, and celebration.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Disability Arts
  • Art Therapy
  • Critical Disability Studies
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
منابع
رجبی ­بهجت، ب. (1390). طراحی و آزمایش یک برنامه­ی هنردرمانی به­منظور بهبود تعامل اجتماعی دانش آموزان درخودمانده 12- 6 ساله. استاد راهنما مهناز اخوان تفتی. استاد مشاور علی زاده­محمدی. کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان­­شناسی. رشته روان­شناسی تربیتی. دانشگاه الزهراء. تهران.
سیداسماعیلی­قمی ن.، شریفی­درآبادی پ.، رضایی س.، دلاور علی. (1400).  تدوین و ارزیابی اثربخشی برنامه‏ی نقاشی‌درمانی مبتنی بر ذهن‏آگاهی بر مهارت‌های  اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان اوتیسم با عملکرد بالا. روان­شناسی مدرسه. 10 (2). 67-84.
ملک زاده, پری. (1389). نگاهی به نقاشی واقع گرا در آمریکا. جلوه هنر، 2 (2), 57-69
میرشمیرانی، ن. (1395). تأثیر موسیقی‌درمانی بر بهبود مهارت‌های کلامی و غیرکلامی کودکان مبتلا به اوتیسم. استاد راهنما حسن ریاحی. استاد مشاور عبدالحسین مختاباد. کارشناسی ارشد دانشکده هنر و معماری دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی.
وکیلی­زاد ن. (1396). «تأثیر آموزش سفالگری بر کفایت اجتماعی و رفتارهای کلیشه­ای کودکان دارای اختلال طیف اتیسم». استاد راهنما دکتر سعید زاویه. استاد راهنمای بخش عملی امیر قمرانی، استاد مشاور محمود کارگر. کارشناسی ارشد. رشته صنایع دستی. دانشکده هنرهای کاربردی.دانشگاه هنر تهران.
References
Alter-Muri, S. B., (2017). Art education and art therapy strategies for autism spectrum disorder students. Art Education70 (5), 20-25.
Bagatell, N., (2010). From cure to community: transforming notions of autism. Ethos 38 (1): 34–58.
Baron-Cohen, S., (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review, New York, Oxford University Press.
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G., (2010). Exploring Disability, Cambridge: Polity.
Behbehani, A. A. (2015). A portrait of a nation: Culturally sensitive art therapy in the Arab world. The Wiley handbook of art therapy, 735-744.
Belek, B., (2019). An anthropological perspective on autism, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 26 (3), 231-241.
Boswell, R. S., (2018). The Art of Seeing Differently: The Bridge Language of Process and Function of the Autistic Artist, a thesis presented to Pacific Northwest College of Art.
Campbell, F. K., (2019). Precision ableism: A studies in ableism approach to developing histories of disability and
abledment, Rethinking History, 23 (2), 138-156.
Cardinal, R., (2009). Outsider Art and the autistic creator, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences, 364 (1522), 1459-1466.
Clark, L., & Marsh, S., (2002). Patriarchy in the UK: The language of disability, The Disability Archive UK.
Clift, S. M., Camic, P., Chapman, B., Clayton, G., Daykin, N., Eades, G., & White, M., (2009). The state of arts and
health in England, Arts & health, 1 (1), 6-35.
Dennett, D. C., (1988). Quining qualia. Consciousness in contemporary science, 42-77.
Devlieger, C., (2018). Disability, the Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology
Eyal, G., (2013). For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic, American Journal of
Sociology, 118 (4), 863-907.
Fein, E., (2011). Innocent Machines: Asperger's Syndrome and the Neurostructural Self. In Sociological
reflections on the neurosciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Fitzgerald, M., (2005). The genesis of artistic creativity: Asperger's syndrome and the arts, Jessica Kingsley
Publishers.
Fombonne, E., (2005). The Changing Epidemiology of Autism, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual
Disabilities, 18 (4): 281–294.
Ginsburg, F. & Rapp, R., (2013). Disability Worlds, Annual Review of Anthropology, 42 (1), 53–68.
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K. L., & Runswick-Cole, K., (2019), Provocations for critical disability studies,
Disability & Society, 34 (6), 972-997.
Goodley, D., & Runswick‐Cole, K., (2011). The violence of disablism, Sociology of health & illness, 33 (4), 602-617.
Grinker, R., (2010). Commentary: On being autistic, and social, Ethos 38 (1):176–83
Grinker, R., (2008). Unstrange Minds, Remapping the World of Autism, publisher, Basic Books.
Hadad, B. S., & Yashar, A., (2022). Sensory perception in autism: What can we learn?, Annual review of vision
science, 8, 239-264.
Hall, Melinda. C., (2019). Critical Disability Theory, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hammell, K. W., (2006). Perspectives on Disability & Rehabilitation: Contesting Assumptions, Challenging
Practice, Toronto: Elsevier Health Science.
Haslam, M., (2005). Modernism and Art Therapy, Canadian Art Therapy Association Journal, 18 (1), 20–27.
Junge, M. B., (2016). History of art therapy, The Wiley handbook of art therapy, Marcia L. Rosal.
Karimi, L. S., Hosseini, S. E. & ManzariTavakoli, F., (2017). The Effects of Sensory Integration Therapy on Physical and Motor Activity of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in Shiraz. Report of Health Care, 3 (2), 42-50, (text in Persian).
Kim, K. S., & Lor, M., (2022). Art Making as a Health Intervention: Concept Analysis and Implications for Nursing
Interventions, Advances in Nursing Science, 45 (2), 155-169.
Levin, G., (2007), Edward Hopper, An Intimate Biography, New York: Rizzoli Publications International.
Malchiodi, C. & McNiff, S., (2007). Expressive therapies, New York: The Guilford Press
Malekzadeh, P., (2009), A look at realist painting in America, Glory of Art (Jelve-y Honar), 2 (2), 57-69, (text in Persian).
Martin, N., (2009). Art therapy and autism: Overview and recommendations, Art Therapy: Journal of the American 
Art Therapy Association, 26 (4), 187-190.
Masefield, P., (2006). Strength: Broadsides from Disability on the Arts. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
McKenzie, R., (2012). A different way to think about creativity: The case of autism and outsider art. In Creative
Engagements with Children: International Perspectives and Contexts.
McNiff, S., (2012). Art heals: How creativity cures the soul. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Mirshemirani, N., (2016). The Effect of Music Therapy on Improvement of Verbal and Nonverbal Skills of Children
with Autism, Supervisor Hassan Riahi, Advisor Abdolhossein Mokhtabad , MA Faculty of Art, Department of
Music, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, (Text in Persian).
Mosgaard. J., (2018). Therapy as anthropology, Cultural psychology of intervention in the globalized world.
Nash, M. C., (2002). The arts as cultural intervention for people with learning disabilities, University of London
press.
Newsinger, J., & Green, W., (2016). Arts Policy and Practice for Disabled Children and Young People:
Towards a ‘Practice Spectrum’ Approach, Disability & Society, 31 (3), 357–372.
RajabiBehjat, B., (2011). Designing and testing an art therapy program to improve the social interaction of 6-
12 year old students, Supervisor Mahnaz Akhwan Tafti, Advisor Ali zadehMohammadi, MA, Faculty of
Educational Sciences and Psychology, Department of Educational Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, (Text in Persian).
Reaume, G., (2014). Understanding critical disability studies, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 186 (16), 1248–1249.
Robertson C.E, Baron-Cohen S., (2017). Sensory perception in autism. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18 (11) :671–84
Roth, I., (2020). Autism, creativity and aesthetics. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17 (4), 498-508.
Rozga, A., Anderson, S., & Robins, D. L. (2011). Major current neuropsychological theories of ASD. The neuropsychology of autism, 97-120.
Sacks, O., (1995), An Anthropologist on Mars: Seven Paradoxical Tales, London: Picador.
Schweizer, C., Knorth, E. J., & Spreen, M., (2014). Art therapy with children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A
review of clinical case descriptions on ‘what works’, The Arts in Psychotherapy, 41 (5), 577-593.
Seyedesmaili Qomi, N., Sharifi Darabadi, P., Rezaei, S., & Delaware, A., (2022). Compilation and evaluation of the effectiveness of the drawing therapy program based on mindfulness on the social skills of high-functioning autistic students, School Psychology, 10 (2), ( Text in Persian).
Shakespeare, T., (2017). Disability: the basics, Routledge.
Shakespeare, T., (2006). The social model of disability, the disability studies reader, 2, 197-204.
Skubby, D., (2012). A history of medical practices in the case of autism: A Foucauldian analysis using archaeology and genealogy, The University of Akron.
Silverman, C., (2008). Fieldwork on another planet: social science perspectives on the autism spectrum, BioSocieties, 3 (3): 325–41.
Smith, S. A., Press, B., Koenig, K. P. & Kinnealey, M., (2005). Effects of sensory integration intervention on self stimulating and self-injurious behaviors. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59 (4), 418-425.
Solvang, P. K., (2018). Between art therapy and disability aesthetics: A sociological approach for understanding
the intersection between art practice and disability discourse, Disability & Society, 33 (2), 238-253.
Stoll, B., (2005). Growing pains: The international development of art therapy’, The Arts in Psychotherapy, 32: 3, 171–91.
Sutherland, J., (2008). “Choices, Rights and Cabaret. Disability Arts and Collective Identity.” In Disability on
Equal Terms edited by J. Swain and S. French, 79–89. London: Sage.
Tremain, S., (2017). Foucault and feminist philosophy of disability, University of Michigan Press.
Vakilizad, N., (2018). The effect of pottery training on social competence and stereotyped behaviors of children
with autism spectrum disorder, Supervisor: Saeed Zawiya, supervisor of the practical department: Amir Qumrani, consultant professor: Mahmoud Kargar, master's degree, field of handicrafts, Faculty of Applied Arts,
Tehran University of Art, (Text in Persain).
Van Lith, T., Stallings, J. W., Harris, C. E., (2017). Discovering Good Practice for Art Therapy with Children Who
Have Autism Spectrum Disorder: The results of a Small Scale Survey. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 54: 78–84.
Van Lith, T., Bullock, L., Rahimian, E. & Moghaddam, K., (2016). A landscape of art-based therapeutic practices in Iran, Journal of Applied Arts &Health, 7 (1), 7–23.
Wilcox, S., (2020). Art, Disability, and Pediatrics: Applying a Disability Studies Framework, Art Therapy, 37  (2), 70- 75.
Williams, D., (2015). Somebody somewhere: Breaking free from the world of autism. Crown.
Yi, C. S. & Moon, C. H., (2020). Art Therapy and Disability Studies. Art Therapy, 37 (2), 59–61.